Azariah Ellington v. Mary Thornton House

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-55733California250 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON; MITCHELL No. 20-55733

D. ELLINGTON,

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-07587-SVW-JDE Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MARY THORNTON HOUSE, Judge; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Azariah M. Ellington and Mitchell D. Ellington appeal pro se from the

district court’s post-judgment order denying their motion to recuse the judges

presiding over their action alleging violations of their civil rights. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. United

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.