Alice Hicks v. Thomas Skaar
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-35918California590 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
SEP 23 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALICE HICKS, No. 20-35918
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05100-RJB
v.
MEMORANDUM*
THOMAS CIFFORD SKAAR; TRACEY
LEE SKAAR; PRINCETON PROPERTY
MANAGEMENT; EVERGREEN
VANCOUVER APARTMENTS, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 22, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Alice Hicks appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in favor of
defendants Thomas Clifford Skaar, Tracey Lee Skaar, Princeton Property
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Management, and Evergreen Vancouver Apartments, LLC (collectively, the