Alice Hicks v. Thomas Skaar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-35918California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 23 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICE HICKS, No. 20-35918

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05100-RJB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

THOMAS CIFFORD SKAAR; TRACEY

LEE SKAAR; PRINCETON PROPERTY

MANAGEMENT; EVERGREEN

VANCOUVER APARTMENTS, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 22, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Alice Hicks appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment in favor of

defendants Thomas Clifford Skaar, Tracey Lee Skaar, Princeton Property

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Management, and Evergreen Vancouver Apartments, LLC (collectively, the

Defendants) in her action alleging that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.