Floo

Floo v. Farm Credit Banks of Sacramento

Good Law
855 F.2d 861
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 28, 198836-3_19California911 words

Opinion

Opinion

855 F.2d 861 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Patricia J. FLOO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FARM CREDIT BANKS OF SACRAMENTO, also known as Federal Land Bank of Sacramento, Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Sacramento, Sacramento Bank for Cooperatives, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-1786. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1988. Decided July 28, 1988. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, SNEED and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Patricia J. Floo appeals a judgment entered after a bench trial. The action arose out of her employment relationship with Farm Credit Banks of Sacramento ("Banks"), where she worked as its Personnel Manager. Appellant alleged that she was terminated in violation of Title VII, an oral and written contract, and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. At the close of appellant's case, the district court granted Banks' motion to dismiss the Title VII claim. At the conclusion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.