Zamanian
United States v. Zamanian
Opinion
Opinion
855 F.2d 864 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hamid ZAMANIAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-5137. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1988. Decided Aug. 10, 1988. Before NELSON, REINHARDT and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Hamid Zamanian appeals his narcotics convictions on two counts of conspiracy and possession, arguing, inter alia, that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. We agree and reverse. 3 The government's case against Zamanian was essentially one of guilt by association coupled with two suspect acts, viz., the removal of a "male purse" from the appellant's automobile and his flight following the arrest of, inter alios, Sattar Nadjmehchi. While the inferences which can be drawn from the above are logically consistent with the government's arguments in support of the conspiracy and possession counts, we are…