Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, and American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Respondent-Intervenor. Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
855 F.2d 1454·129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12235
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 1, 198887-7138California9,807 words

Opinion

Opinion

855 F.2d 1454 129 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2256 , 57 USLW 2196 IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, and American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Respondent-Intervenor. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 87-7138, 87-7146, 87-7208 and 87-7209. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued Dec. 8, 1987. Submission Withdrawn Dec. 10, 1987. Resubmitted Jan. 7, 1988. Decided Sept. 1, 1988. Dwight A. Rabuse, Appellate Staff, Civil Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for petitioner-cross-respondent. Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, D.C., for respondent-cross-petitioner. Judith D. Galat, American Federation of Government Employees, Washington, D.C., for respondent-intervenor. On Petitions for Review and Cross-Applications for Enforcement of Orders of the Federal Labor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.