Blake v. Dierdorff

Good Law
856 F.2d 1365·12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 622·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12236
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 198887-5819California3,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

856 F.2d 1365 12 Fed.R.Serv.3d 622 , RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 7026 Aaron BLAKE; Ruth Blake; Aaron Blake, D.D.S., P.C. Employees Pension Trust; Aaron Blake, D.D.S., P.C. Retirement Trust, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel W. DIERDORFF; Harry L. Summers; Tadashi Fujita; John McKenna Case; Allan Koljonen; Richard C. Raimann; Leff & Mason; Ernest Leff; John Grosvenor; Van D. Greenfield; Sun Savings and Loan Association; Arthur Young & Company; and Kenneth Clare, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-5819. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 6, 1988. Decided Sept. 8, 1988. Simon J. Freedman and William S. Lerach, Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants. Scott L. Metzger, Duckor & Spradling, Alex C. McDonald, McDonald, Hecht & Solberg, David Pendarvis, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, San Diego, Cal., Eugene R. Erbstoesser, Arthur Young & Company, Associate General Counsel, New York City, Michael I. Goode, Newport Beach, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Daniel W. Dierdorff, La Jolla, Cal., in pro. per. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.