Cassidy v. Tenorio

Bad Law
856 F.2d 1412·12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 412·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12300
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 198887-2217California3,844 words

Opinion

Opinion

856 F.2d 1412 12 Fed.R.Serv.3d 412 David W. CASSIDY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan C. TENORIO; Juan C. Tenorio & Associates, a Guam Corporation; Juan C. Tenorio & Associates, a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Defendants-Appellants. No. 87-2217. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1988. * Decided Sept. 12, 1988. Jeffrey R. Siegel, Gill & Siegel, Agana, Guam, for defendants-appellants. G. Patrick Civille, Moore, Ching, Boertzel & Lawlor, Agana, Guam, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam. Before WALLACE, REINHARDT and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 Tenorio appeals from the decision of the Appellate Division of the District Court of Guam, affirming the Guam Superior Court's denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment and denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 and 48 U.S.C. Sec. 1424-3 (c), and we affirm. 2 * Cassidy and Tenorio were business partners who jointly owned and operated several small corporations in Guam and Saipan. Among these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.