Roberts v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

Good Law
857 F.2d 646·12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 810·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12740
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 198887-2106California4,791 words

Opinion

Opinion

857 F.2d 646 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,028, 12 Fed.R.Serv.3d 810 Phillip D. ROBERTS; Lynn Roberts; Denny Delk; Karen Delk; William J. Freschi, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant, and Houston Harbaugh, P.C., Defendant/Appellee. Nos. 87-2106, 87-2128 and 87-2278. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 15, 1988. Decided Sept. 19, 1988. Solomon B. Cera, David B. Gold, P.C., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants/cross-appellees. Richard N. Patterson, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellee/cross-appellant. James J. Corbelli, Lillick, McHose & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant/appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before SCHROEDER * and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, ** District Judge. PER CURIAM: OVERVIEW 1 Plaintiffs are a class of investors who purchased interests in limited partnerships offered by an array of individuals and corporate entities. Defendants are accountants and attorneys…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.