Bateson v. Geisse

Caution
857 F.2d 1300·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12913
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 198887-3605California3,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

857 F.2d 1300 Gerald BATESON, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. P. William GEISSE; Michael Cucciardi; Jim Gonzales; Walter Persoma, Jr.; Marion Dozier; John Michunovich; C. Dale Vermillion; and City of Billings, a municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Nos. 87-3605 and 87-3640. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1988. Decided Sept. 20, 1988. Ken D. Peterson, Peterson, Schofield and Leckie, Billings, Mont., for defendants-appellants/cross-appellees. Robert L. Stephens, Jr., Stephens Law Firm, P.C., Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee/cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. Before WRIGHT, BRUNETTI and TROTT, Circuit Judges. BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge: 1 This case involves a controversy over the use of land within the City of Billings between the appellee Gerald Bateson, a self-employed builder, and the appellants, individual city council members and the City of Billings. Bateson purchased certain real property within Billings for $435,000.00 intending to build on the property a condominium development, a use which complied with the applicable zoning…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.