Tripati v. Henman

Good Law
857 F.2d 1366·12 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 409·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 12918
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 26, 198887-2323California1,113 words

Opinion

Opinion

857 F.2d 1366 12 Fed.R.Serv.3d 409 Anant Kumar TRIPATI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.L. HENMAN; Ogis Fields, Regional Director, Western Region; Norman Carlson, Director Federal Prison System; William Perrill; R.J. Barncastle; Willis Gibson; Chuck Smallwood; Yolanda Savage, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-2323. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1988 * . Decided Sept. 26, 1988. Anant Kumar Tripati, La Tuna, Tex., in pro. per. James D. Whitney, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellant Tripati presents us with the interesting question of whether a prisoner's constitutional right of access to the courts encompasses the right to an adequate law library, to enable the prisoner to defend civil forfeiture actions. Unfortunately, he presents it on the wrong appeal. 2 In June 1986, Tripati filed a complaint against federal prison officials (action # 1), alleging the inadequacy of the law library at the Federal Correctional Institution at Tucson. On April 14, 1987, the district court, in granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.