Davis

857 F.2d 1477 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Levern DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF TUCSON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-2261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 13, 1988. * Decided Aug. 29, 1988. Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Levern Davis appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his complaint and amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm. 3 In September 1983, appellant, a custodian for the City of Tucson (the City), suffered a work-related knee and back injury. In April 1985, the City fired appellant based on a determination that his injury left him physically unable to perform his job. Appellant underwent surgery and received follow-up treatment for his injury. In June 1985 the Industrial Commission of Arizona found appellant partially disabled and awarded him monthly disability benefits. 4 On May 22, 1977…