Danner v. Himmelbarf

Good Law
858 F.2d 515·13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 292·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13308
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 28, 198887-6021California6,267 words

Opinion

Opinion

858 F.2d 515 57 USLW 2264 , Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,034 , 13 Fed.R.Serv.3d 292 Robert E. DANNER; Charlotte Danner; Gadan, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Henry HIMMELFARB; Charles T. Hays; Richard A. Edwards; Golden Arrow Gas Energy Corporation; Jim Kitchens; Ronald G. Miller; Thomas E. Stepp; Rutan & Tucker; Robert Pike; Empire Equities; Ronald Garrett; Andre Iseli, Defendants/Cross-defendants/Appellees, Vincent E. Davis, Defendant/Cross-claimant/Appellant. No. 87-6021. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1988. Decided Sept. 28, 1988. Gordon T. Carey, Jr., Portland, Or., for defendant/cross-complainant/appellant. Edmund G. Farrell, III, and B. Eric Nelson, Murchison & Cumming, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/cross-defendants/appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: 1 The district court granted summary judgment against Vincent E. Davis on his federal securities law claim and dismissed his state law claims against Henry Himmelfarb, Charles T. Hays, Richard A. Edwards, Golden Arrow Gas Energy Corp.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.