Oster v. Barco Of California Employees' Retirement Plan

Good Law
859 F.2d 1345
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 11, 198886-5696California3,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

859 F.2d 1345 Sam OSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BARCO OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN: Managing Committee of the Barco of California Employees' Retirement Plan; Barco of California; Michael Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-5696. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1987. Decided Oct. 11, 1988. Ronald Dean, Pacific Palisades, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Jay R. Ziegler, Buchalter, Nemer, Fields, Chrystie & Younger, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before NELSON, HALL and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: 1 Sam Oster, a former employee of Barco of California (Barco), brought this action against Barco, the Barco Employees' Retirement Plan (the Plan), and the Barco Plan's Managing Committee (the Committee), alleging that the Committee's denial of his request for payment of his retirement benefits in a lump sum was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. The district court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the Committee was exercising its discretion as provided for in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.