In re Wilson CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 2021F083030California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/24/21 In re Wilson CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re F083030

JOSEPH WILSON, (Kings Super. Ct. No. 95CM1143)

On Habeas Corpus. OPINION

THE COURT*

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of habeas corpus. Joseph Wilson, in propria persona, for Petitioner. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, and Max Feinstat, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. -ooOoo- Petitioner seeks permission to file a belated notice of appeal under the constructive filing doctrine set forth in In re Benoit (1973) 10 Cal.3d 73 (Benoit). In an informal response, the Attorney General contends petitioner “failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.