Rosette Pambakian v. Gregory Blatt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202120-55076California897 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSETTE PAMBAKIAN, No. 20-55076

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07053-MWF-FFM v.

GREGORY BLATT; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 12, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,** CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rosette Pambakian appeals a district court decision

compelling arbitration of her claims. In August 2019, Pambakian sued Gregory

Blatt, IAC/Interactive Corp., and Match Group, Inc., asserting that Blatt sexually

assaulted her after the 2016 Tinder, Inc. holiday party. Blatt and the companies

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.