Gregory Blatt v. Rosette Pambakian
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 24, 202120-55084California961 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORY BLATT, No. 20-55084
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-07046-MWF-FFM v.
ROSETTE PAMBAKIAN; SEAN RAD, MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 12, 2021 San Francisco, California
Before: SILER,** CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Defendants-Appellants Rosette Pambakian and Sean Rad appeal from the
district court’s order that granted in part and denied in part their anti-SLAPP
motions. In August 2019, Plaintiff-Appellee Gregory Blatt sued Pambakian and Rad
for defamation based on their comments to the media regarding an unrelated lawsuit,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for…