Carrillo

Carrillo v. Colombi-Monguio

Good Law
862 F.2d 318
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 198836-3_4California919 words

Opinion

Opinion

862 F.2d 318 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elma B. CARRILLO, Plaintiff/Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. Alicia de COLOMBI-MONGUIO, in her official and individual capacity, Defendant/Appellant-Cross-Appellee. 1 Nos. 87-2267, 87-2348. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1988. Decided Nov. 3, 1988. 3 Before WALLACE, TANG and NELSON. 4 MEMORANDUM * 5 Elma B. Carrillo claims that she was discharged from her position as an instructor at the University of Arizona by Alicia de Colombi-Monguio in retaliation for exercise of her first amendment rights, in violation of 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . The district court denied Colombi-Monguio's motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds and she currently appeals that decision. Carrillo cross appeals the district court's order limiting discovery. We affirm the district court's denial of summary judgment and dismiss the cross-appeal for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.