Anderson

Anderson v. Hughes Helicopter

Good Law
865 F.2d 263
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 28, 198836-3_9California4,695 words

Opinion

Opinion

865 F.2d 263 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Blagden ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES HELICOPTERS, INC.; J.M. Harrison; K.B. Amer; S.V. La Forge; R. Kiss; C.W. Bradshaw, Defendant-Appellees. No. 87-5704. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 31, 1988. Decided Dec. 28, 1988. Before FLETCHER, ALARCON and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Appellant Ronald Anderson appeals pro se from the order dismissing his Title VII complaint with prejudice for failure to appear on the date set for trial and the denial of his motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Anderson seeks reversal on the following grounds: (1) the district court abused its discretion by failing to provide him with notice or a hearing prior to dismissing the action; (2) the district court lacks power sua sponte to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute; (3) the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.