Basadre-Lacunza

865 F.2d 265 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose E. BASADRE-LACUNZA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 87-1389. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * Nov. 21, 1988. Decided Dec. 22, 1988. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, HUG and BEEZER, Circuit Judges: 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A jury convicted Jose E. Basadre-Lacunza on two counts of distributing cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1). Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Agent William Haleck testified at Basadre-Lucunza's trial that Basadre-Lacunza twice sold him cocaine. Philip Peters, a paid DEA informer who introduced Agent Haleck to Basadre-Lacunza also testified that Basadre-Lacunza had supplied him with cocaine approximately twelve times over the past five years. 3 Before trial, Basadre-Lacunza requested discovery of the names and prior statements of each prospective Government witness. After trial, Basadre-Lacunza's…