Charles

Charles v. U.S. Bank, N.A. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 2021C089024California1,948 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hoch, J.

Filed 9/27/21 Charles v. U.S. Bank, N.A. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Nevada) ----

STANLEY PETER CHARLES III, C089024

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. TCU12-5038)

v.

U.S. BANK, N.A.,

Defendant;

TORY M. PANKOPF,

Third Party Claimant and Respondent.

Appellant, Stanley Peter Charles III, appeals the trial court’s order transferring the registry funds held with the court to Charles’s former attorney’s client trust account. He complains: (1) the trial court exceeded its subject matter jurisdiction in granting relief to nonparty former attorney Tory M. Pankopf; (2) Pankopf does not have a valid attorney fee lien; (3) Pankopf is not a third party beneficiary to the settlement agreement; and (4) Pankopf…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.