Almeida
Almeida v. Olympusat CA2/1
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 9/27/21 Almeida v. Olympusat CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
DINA ALMEIDA, et al., B303724
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV22597) v.
OLYMPUSAT INC., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Stephanie M. Bowick, Judge. Affirmed. Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai, Dan Stormer, Barbara Enloe Hadsell, Theresa Zhen, Brian Olney; Scott Wagner and Associates and Lindsey Wagner for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Lathrop GPM, Laura Reathaford and Jeffrey A. Richmond for Defendants and Respondents.
_________________________ This case asks us to decide whether Florida or California is the better place to hear…