Frank K. Kotarski v. V.L. Cooper, A.E. Navarro, W.J. Tinston, J.H. Kirkpatrick, Naval Air Rework Facility, Capt. P.A. Monroe, in His Official Capacity

Bad Law
866 F.2d 311·1989 WL 4927·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 659
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 27, 198984-5673California677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

This case has been remanded by the Supreme Court for our reconsideration in light of its recent decision in Schweiker v. Chilicky, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2460 , 101 L.Ed.2d 370 (1988). When the matter was last before us, we held that the district court erred in dismissing Kotarski’s Bivens claim because he had no meaningful remedy for violations of his constitutional rights. Kotarski v. Cooper, 799 F.2d 1342 (9th Cir.1986). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our decision, and remanded the case. Cooper v. Kotarski, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 897 (1988). Upon reconsideration, we reverse our prior decision and affirm the district court.

Frank K. Kotarski was a civilian employee of the Navy. He was promoted to a supervisory position subject to a one-year probationary period. He was demoted to his former position during that year, and later filed suit for damages under Bivens. He alleged that he had been demoted because his superiors did not approve of his living arrangements with a woman friend, in violation of his constitutional right to privacy, and because he had expressed disagreement with certain policies and expenditures, in violation of his first amendment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.