Muniz

Muniz v. CTC Investors CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021F079107California5,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/21 Muniz v. CTC Investors CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

ALBERTO MUNIZ et al.,

F079107 & F082080

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 16CV-01443) v.

CTC INVESTORS, LLC, OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County. Brian L. McCabe, Judge. Law Offices of Michael E. Adams and Michael E. Adams for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Law Offices of Margot L. Roen and Margot L. Roen for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiffs1 claim to have sustained damages as a result of their reliance on false representations made by an on-site manager at their mobilehome park to the effect that no governmental approvals would be needed to make improvements. Plaintiffs insist…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.