Doe

Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021A159023California7,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/30/21 Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A159023

v. THE REGENTS OF THE (Alameda County UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Super. Ct. No. HG18897877) Defendant and Respondent.

John Doe was a senior at University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB), when fellow student Jane Roe reported that he engaged in dating violence against her in violation of University of California policy. John admitted that, after arguing with Jane for hours, he “grabbed her, screamed in her face and shook her” and “eventually dragged her out of the bed to the front door” of his home. Following an investigation, the university found John…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.