Doe

Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021A159004California10,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/30/21 Doe v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JOHN DOE,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A159004

v. THE REGENTS OF THE (Alameda County UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Super. Ct. No. RG19007666) Defendant and Respondent.

John Doe was a student at University of California, Davis (UC Davis), when fellow student Jane Roe reported that he engaged in nonconsensual sexual intercourse with her in violation of University of California policy. John agreed they had sex but said Jane consented. Following an investigation, UC Davis found that, on the night John and Jane had sex, Jane was incapacitated due to alcohol such that she was unable to consent and that, given her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.