Barajas

Barajas v. Ortiz-Nance CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021F079179California9,583 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/21 Barajas v. Ortiz-Nance CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

NORMA BARAJAS,

F079179

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. VCU272718) v.

EDWYN ORTIZ-NANCE et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Bret D. Hillman, Judge.

Law Office of Peter Sean Bradley and Peter Sean Bradley for Plaintiff and Appellant. Michael L. Schulte; Farley Law Firm, Michael L. Farley, and Joseph Beery for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Dr. Norma Barajas (plaintiff) holds a Ph.D. in educational psychology. Several years after obtaining her doctorate, plaintiff endeavored to become a licensed clinical psychologist. The licensure requirements included 3,000 hours of providing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.