State of Cal. v. So. Cal. Edison Co. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
In October 2016, Edison applied to Caltrans for a permit to encroach on a state
highway right-of-way to perform aerial utility work. In its application, Edison specified
that traffic breaks would be needed for it to perform the work and that the California
Highway Patrol (CHP) would conduct those traffic breaks. Caltrans issued the permit,
which provided that the CHP would conduct the necessary traffic breaks. Edison and the
CHP entered into an agreement for the CHP to perform specified traffic control services
on the day that Edison did the work covered by the encroachment permit.
According to the allegations in the operative complaint, Edison performed the
permitted work on October 23, 2016, and the CHP conducted the first traffic break early
that morning, causing traffic on the freeway to come to a complete stop. The CHP
2 “released stopped traffic, but a semi tractor-trailer remained stopped at the end of the
traffic queue because its driver fell asleep.” A bus then collided with the trailer, resulting
in the deaths of 13 people and injuring others.
Numerous lawsuits arising from the bus collision were filed. In 2017, Caltrans
was named as a defendant…