Li

Li v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021C092584California10,530 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

QUINN LI, C092584

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 34202080003396)

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT

OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY,

Respondent;

MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING in mandate. Petition denied. James P. Arguelles, Judge.

La Follette, Johnson, DeHaas, Fesler & Ames, Nicole D. Hendrickson; Rothschild Wishek & Sands, Michael Rothschild; John D. Harwell; Max H. Hare, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Gloria L. Castro, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Mary Cain-Simon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Rebecca D. Wagner, Deputy Attorney General, for Real Party in Interest.

For almost 45 years, California trial courts have followed the rule laid down by Chamberlain that a trial court exercising its independent judgment under Code of Civil

1 Procedure1 section 1094.5 must determine whether the administrative agency’s findings are supported by the preponderance of the evidence,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.