Pillsbury

People v. Pillsbury

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 2021C089002California7,795 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/30/

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C089002

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 12F07593)

v.

JERED PILLSBURY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, Geoffrey A. Goodman, Judge. Reversed with directions.

Jared G. Coleman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Carlos A. Martinez, Chung Mi Choi, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1 In this case, we address issues related to the 2018 amendments to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)1 and the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) program related to those amendments. We conclude that, upon the recommendation of the Secretary of CDCR (the Secretary), trial courts have the authority to recall and resentence defendants based on post-judgment changes in the law giving courts discretion to strike or dismiss enhancements, even when the judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.