Telstar, Inc. v. Telstar Corp.
Opinion
Opinion
867 F.2d 613 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TELSTAR, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TELSTAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. 1 No. 88-1515. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * Dec. 16, 1988. Decided Jan. 23, 1989. 3 Before BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges, and JESSE W. CURTIS, ** District Judge. 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 This is an appeal from an order enforcing a stipulation and judgment. Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing appellant an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we AFFIRM. 6 In August 1982, plaintiff-appellee, Telstar, Inc., filed a complaint against defendant-appellant, Telstar Corporation, concerning the use of the service mark "Telstar" by Telstar Corporation. The action was settled, and a stipulation and judgment were rendered September 9, 1982. 7 Sometime thereafter, a dispute arose between the parties concerning the allowable use of the service marks…