Corbin

Williams v. Corbin

Good Law
867 F.2d 614·1989 WL 7691
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 198936-3_2California885 words

Opinion

Opinion

867 F.2d 614 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert K. CORBIN, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-1659. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * Jan. 26, 1989. Decided Jan. 30, 1989. Before HUG, SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Williams (Williams) appeals pro se the district court's grant of Robert K. Corbin, et al.'s (Corbin) motion to dismiss Williams's civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . We reverse and remand. 3 The district court determined that Williams consented to Corbin's motion to dismiss by failing to file an opposing brief or memorandum. Williams contends that the district court erred in applying the United States District court rules for the District of Arizona, Rule 11(h), which states that a party deems to consent to any motion that it fails to oppose. 1 Williams' efforts to respond show that he did not consent to Corbin's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.