Ripplinger v. Collins

Caution
868 F.2d 1043·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2165
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 198987-2501California8,057 words

Opinion

Opinion

868 F.2d 1043 Mary Beth RIPPLINGER; David Lee; Sylvia Kammeyer; Steve Kammeyer; Robert Brown; Barbara Wodrich; Brian Heath; Darlene Schell; Barb Chew; George Wectstein; Judy Price; Ed Price; Bill Schindler; Robert S. McBride; Wayne Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas A. COLLINS, in his official capacity as Maricopa County Attorney, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-2501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 16, 1988. Decided Feb. 24, 1989. Richard J. Hertzberg, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. Benjamin W. Bull, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before SCHROEDER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS, Jr., * District Judge. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Plaintiffs, Mary Beth Ripplinger and other owners of video stores, adult theatres, and bookstores, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Thomas Collins, the Maricopa County Attorney [hereinafter the "state" or "Collins"]. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming the Arizona obscenity regulation scheme is unconstitutional on its face. We affirm in part and reverse in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.