United States v. Rex G. Endicott

Good Law
869 F.2d 452·1989 WL 16692·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 2491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 198988-3077California2,480 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tang, J.

After being convicted on various firearms charges, Rex Endicott appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and on juror-witness contact. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Endicott was a federally licensed firearms dealer. After a one-month jury trial, he was convicted of various firearms offenses. The principal government witness against Endicott was Mr. Dick Jones, a paid Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) civilian undercover agent. En-dicott illegally transferred a machine gun and two undocumented pistols to Jones; conversations between Jones and Endicott were surreptitiously tape recorded. United States v. Endicott, 803 F.2d 506, 508 (9th Cir.1986). Endicott also sold another machine gun to informant Alex Caine. Based on information gathered by Jones, a search warrant was obtained for Endicott’s home which also served as his place of business. A machine gun, other undocumented firearms, and a silencer were seized. Endicott, 803 F.2d at 508 .

Before trial, Endicott had filed a motion asking for details on any payments, promises, or inducements given to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.