Costa

United States v. Costa

Good Law
869 F.2d 1498
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 16, 198936-3_4California711 words

Opinion

Opinion

869 F.2d 1498 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Michael COSTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 7, 1989. * Decided Feb. 16, 1989. Before FARRIS, FERGUSON, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Costa appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment charging him with making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1001 . Costa contends that the district court erred in denying his motion on the ground that the indictment was a violation of his Fifth Amendment right against double jeopardy. We affirm the judgment of the district court. I. 3 On April 13, 1987, Costa entered a plea of guilty for aiding and abetting the illegal entry of aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1325 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 , and was thereafter sentenced to three years probation. During those proceedings, Costa had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.