United States v. Harry E. Claiborne

Good Law
870 F.2d 1463·1989 WL 24461·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3465
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 22, 198988-1656California3,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Norris, J.

On December 8, 1983, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging appellant Harry Claiborne, then a United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, with bribery, tax fraud, and making a false statement to the Judicial Ethics Committee. Chief Justice Burger designated Senior District Judge Walter Hoffman to preside over appellant’s trial. Chief Justice Burger had received a certificate of necessity from Judge Browning, Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292 (d) (1982). Judge Browning also certified to Chief Justice Burger on January 14, 1985 the need for out-of-circuit circuit judges to preside over appellant’s pretrial appeals and all other appeals involving appellant, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 291 (a) (1982). Acting on that request, Chief Justice Burger designated Judges Floyd R. Gibson of the Eighth Circuit, Leonard I. Garth of the Third Circuit, and Cornelia G. Kennedy of the Sixth Circuit.

Appellant’s pre-trial motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that a federal judge cannot be prosecuted for a federal crime without first being impeached was denied by Judge Hoffman, and his ruling was affirmed on appeal by the panel of Judges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.