United States v. Omar Rushdan, United States of America v. Omar Rushdan

Good Law
870 F.2d 1509·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 3959
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 198987-5196, 87-5208California2,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Leavy, J.

Omar Rushdan was found guilty of conspiracy to traffic in and possess counterfeit credits cards in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (b)(2) (Supp. IV 1986) and of possession of fifteen or more counterfeit credit cards in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(3) (Supp. IV 1986). After the verdict, the trial court granted Rushdan’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the possession count holding that the evidence was insufficient to show the possession affected interstate commerce. The trial court denied Rushdan’s motion for judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy count.

The government appeals the granting of judgment of acquittal on the possession count. Rushdan appeals denial of judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy count. We reverse as to the possession count and affirm as to the conspiracy count.

FACTS

In February of 1987 Omar Rushdan, Raynard Newton, and Joseph Batie, an employee of First Interstate Bank of California, met to discuss the manufacture and use of counterfeit credit cards. Batie disclosed that he had access to credit card numbers with high credit limits. A few days later, Batie provided a list of credit card account numbers to Newton, who gave them to Rushdan.

In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.