National Wildlife Federation v. Burford

Good Law
871 F.2d 849·107 Oil & Gas Rep. 488·19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20656·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 198987-4375California4,751 words

Opinion

Opinion

871 F.2d 849 19 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,656 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION; Montana Wildlife Federation; Northern Plains Resource Council, a Montana Non-Profit Corporation; Powder River Basin Resource Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert F. BURFORD, Director, Bureau of Land Management; James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior; United States Department of the Interior, Defendants-Appellees, State of Wyoming; Meadowlark Farms, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees, and Shell Oil Company; Western Energy Co., Defendants-Intervenors. No. 87-4375. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 9, 1989. Decided March 30, 1989. Glenn P. Sugameli (Argued), National Wildlife Federation, Washington, D.C., James A. Patten, Patten Law Firm, Billings, Mont., Eldon V.C. Greenberg, Galloway & Greenberg, of counsel, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellants. Steven P. Quarles, Thomas R. Lundquist, Crowell & Moring, Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor-appellee State of Wyo. Roger J. Marzulla, Asst. Atty. Gen., Byron H. Dunbar, U.S. Atty., Butte, Mont., Robert L. Klarquist, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the federal defendants-appellees.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.