Firey
Firey v. State of Washington
Opinion
Opinion
872 F.2d 427 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nina Marie FIREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; King County of Washington; Local Union No. 77 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; and Washington State Bar Association, City of Seattle, Defendants-Appellees. 1 No. 88-3704. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 8, 1989. Decided March 10, 1989. 3 Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT and ALARCON, Circuit Judges, and EDWARD RAFEEDIE, * District Judge. 4 MEMORANDUM ** 5 Nina Firey, appealing pro se, challenges the district court's dismissal of her civil rights complaint in favor of four defendants and grant of summary judgment in favor of a fifth. We affirm. 1 FACTS 6 Firey worked for Seattle City Light from April 1978 to November 1982. During most of that period, she was a member of Local 77 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. 7 After her resignation, she was…