Whatley

Whatley v. Fresno County Attorney General

Good Law
872 F.2d 432
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 31, 198936-3_5California263 words

Opinion

Opinion

872 F.2d 432 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alton Bea WHATLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRESNO COUNTY, Attorney General of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-2484. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 8, 1989. * Decided March 31, 1989. Before KILKENNY, WIGGINS, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alton Whatley, Jr., a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. The district court dismissed Whatley's petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. 3 The district court's judgement is reversed. Whatley presented his federal habeas claim for back time credits to the California Supreme Court in a petition for habeas corpus. Because Whatley's petition was denied without opinion or citation, we treat Whatley's claim as having been denied on the merits. See Larue v. McCarthy, 833 F.2d 140, 143 (9th Cir.1987)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.