United States v. Virgil Sam Runco

Good Law
873 F.2d 1230·1989 WL 37317·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5370
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 198987-1277California950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Noonan, J.

Virgil Sam Runco was indicted for possession with intent to distribute one kilo of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (1982) and of attempting to possess with intent to distribute approximately 20 kilos of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1982). He was acquitted of the first count and convicted of the second. His motion to set aside the verdict and to have a judgment of acquittal entered was denied. He appeals. We affirm his conviction.

FACTS

In August 1986 Runco was identified by a government informant as a dealer in cocaine. A series of meetings with government undercover agents culminated in a meeting at the San Francisco Airport Hilton Hotel on March 10, 1987. There Rodney Alvarez, a Drug Enforcement Administration agent, posed as Jorge, a drug supplier, and by prearrangement met Runco and took him to his hotel room. A video tape made by the government records the following exchange:

This conversation thus ended with the agreement of Alvarez to purchase 20 kilos at a price of $15,000 per kilo. Runco added that the cocaine that Alvarez would show him must be satisfactory. Alvarez then produced one kilo of cocaine. Runco sampled it and seemed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.