United States v. Facchini

Good Law
874 F.2d 638
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 198986-3122California5,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

874 F.2d 638 Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 21,916 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Danielle FACCHINI, Mark D. East, John C. Clinton, Thomas P. Croman, Anthony Horst, Robert Finley, Roger W. Richardson, Clifford W. Lloyd, Paul Clark, Katherine L. Richardson, Dana S. Rake, Cynthia Hoofard, Steven M. Job, Josephine G. Booth, David M. Hartzell, Philip Jackson, Joe L. Stephens, Gordon Weller, Thomas A. Peterson, Michael A. Pangle, David Hoffman, Carolyn A. Jackson, Richard T. Salas, Crystal L. Jones, Daniel L. Maher, Deanne Smith, Eddie Leo Card, Rick S. Reifenrath, and Jonathan Geissel, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 86-3094, 86-3097 to 86-3099, 86-3101, 86-3102, 86-3104 to 86-3111, 86-3117, 86-3118, 86-3121, 86-3123, 86-3128, 86-3137 to 86-3140, 86-3148, 86-3122, 86-3154, 86-3161, 86-3177 and 86-3100. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued En Banc and Submitted Nov. 17, 1988. Decided May 9, 1989. Frank Noonan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee. Steven T. Wax, Federal Public Defender, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellants (all defendants except Geissel). Marc D. Blackman, Ransom, Blackman & Simson, Portland, Or., for defendant-appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.