Stevenson

Stevenson v. Potlatch Corp.

Good Law
874 F.2d 816
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 198936-3_25California674 words

Opinion

Opinion

874 F.2d 816 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert E. STEVENSON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. POTLATCH CORPORATION, Defendant/Appellee. No. 88-3533. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Apr. 3, 1989. Decided May 9, 1989. Before SKOPIL, PREGERSON and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Robert Stevenson appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of his employer, Potlatch Corporation. Stevenson alleged that Potlatch violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 623 (a)(1) (1982), and Idaho's age discrimination statute, Idaho Code Sec. 67-5909(1) (Supp.1988), by forcing him to resign his position as a plant manager. The district court granted summary judgment because it determined there existed no genuine issue of material fact that Potlatch's proffered reasons for termination were a pretext for age discrimination. Stevenson v. Potlatch Corp., 674 F.Supp.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.