Weissman

Weissman v. Rubenstein

Good Law
874 F.2d 818·1989 WL 46715
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 198936-3_1California841 words

Opinion

Opinion

874 F.2d 818 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Larry WEISSMAN, Thomas W. Stevens, Eleutheran Arts Guild, Inc., a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, White Panther Party, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michael RUBENSTEIN, Michael Hennessey, In His Capacity As Sheriff Of The City and County Of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-2864. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted * April 27, 1989. Decided May 1, 1989. Before HUG, SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry Weissman and Thomas Stevens appeal pro se the district court's grant of Michael Rubenstein's motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights complaint against him pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We affirm. 3 In October 1977, Michael Rubenstein bought a house at 400-410 Cole St., San Francisco. The house was being occupied by Larry Weissman, Tom Stevens and others. Stevens instituted an adverse possession action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.