Kenneth Farley v. Daniel E. Henderson, Arnold K. Riley Carolyn B. Riley Tamara Riley Robert J. Wright v. Daniel E. Henderson AKA Dan Harris James Lowell Jerry Borsch Tom Honte Randy Jones Mervin Lakin Sandra Ramsey Board of Medical Examiners

Good Law
875 F.2d 231
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 198987-1777California1,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

875 F.2d 231 Kenneth FARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel E. HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellee. Arnold K. RILEY; Carolyn B. Riley; Tamara Riley; Robert J. Wright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Daniel E. HENDERSON; aka Dan Harris; James Lowell; Jerry Borsch; Tom Honte; Randy Jones; Mervin Lakin; Sandra Ramsey; Board of Medical Examiners, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 87-1777, 87-2275. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided May 17, 1989. Kenneth Farley, pro se. Robert J. Wright, Noti, Or., pro se and for plaintiffs-appellants. Jane E. Beach, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before POOLE, FERGUSON and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants in these two consolidated actions are members of the Holy Spirit of God Church. Both actions raise the identical issue: Whether the arrest of "psychic surgeon" Gary Magno by Phoenix police officer Daniel Henderson deprived appellants of their first amendment free exercise rights. We conclude that it did not and affirm the dismissal of both actions. 2 Magno professes to be a "psychic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.