Tso
Tso v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
875 F.2d 871 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ching-Sang TSO, aka Samson Alton Tso Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. 1 No. 87-7497. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1989. Decided May 22, 1989. 3 Before WIGGINS and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and MARSH, District Judge. * 4 MEMORANDUM ** 5 Ching-Sang Tso, aka Samson Alton Tso, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) denial of his request for a waiver of deportation under Sec. 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). 6 The BIA's decision that the Immigration Judge properly considered the seriousness of petitioner's criminal history against the factors weighing in favor of a waiver of deportation is sufficiently supported by a reasoned explanation based upon legitimate concerns. See Vargas v. INS., 831 F.2d 906, 908 (1988). 7 We do not have…