United States v. John L. Molinaro

Good Law
876 F.2d 1432·1989 WL 59810·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 198989-50140California328 words

Opinion

Opinion

John L. Molinaro appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for revocation of the district court’s pretrial detention order. Molinaro argues that his pretrial detention violated 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (f) because the government failed to move for his detention at the time of his first appearance before a magistrate on the underlying charges. The government concedes that it failed to move for pretrial detention at appellant’s first appearance but urges us to carve out an exception to this requirement under § 3142(f) in cases where the defendant is legitimately in custody on other charges.

We find no basis for writing into the statute an exception for defendants already in custody on other charges. The language of § 3142(f) allows for only one exception: a brief continuance under prescribed circumstances. Otherwise, a detention hearing must be held upon the person’s first appearance before the judicial officer. When statutory language is clear and unambiguous, as it is here, a judicial inquiry into the meaning of the statute ends. See Rubin v. United States, 449 U.S. 424, 430 , 101 S.Ct. 698, 701-02 , 66 L.Ed.2d 633 (1981); United States v. Patterson, 820 F.2d 1524, 1526 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.