United States v. Shah
Opinion
Opinion
878 F.2d 272 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Siddharth Shanabhai SHAH, Kenneth Dean Chandler, Ernest Roy Cassells, Jr., Gerald Chester Sealund, Jaime Quintanilla, David W. Burkhardt, Albert H. Lozano, James Howard Schlichtmann, Howard Schlichtmann, Thomas J. Lennon, Jaime Orlando Quintanilla, Gerald Chester Sealund, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 88-1061 to 88-1063, 88-1076 to 88-1078, 88-1085, 88-1086, 88-1115, 88-1119, 88-1123 and 88-1126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1988. Decided June 21, 1989. Anne Flower Cumings, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant chandler. Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, Christopher J. Cannon, Asst. Federal Public Defender, for defendant-appellant Quintanilla. Doron Weinberg, Lynne S. Coffin, Larson & Weinberg, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Lennon. Marcus S. Topel, Daniel F. Cook, Topel & Goodman, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Shah. Marvin S. Cahn, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Burkhardt. Stephen J. Perelson, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant Lorenzo. William Pinkus, Santa Rosa, Cal., for defendant-appellant…