Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,489 Frederick W. Gooding v. Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. And Phillip J. Failla, Frederick W. Gooding v. Shearson Lehman Brothers Inc. And Phillip J. Failla

Good Law
878 F.2d 281
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 23, 198988-5506California1,886 words

Opinion

Opinion

878 F.2d 281 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,489 Frederick W. GOODING, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. and Phillip J. Failla, Defendants-Appellants. Frederick W. GOODING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC. and Phillip J. Failla, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 88-5506, 88-5509. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 4, 1988. Decided June 23, 1989. Robert H. Logan, Keesal, Young & Logan, Long Beach, Cal., for Shearson Lehman Bros. Inc., and Phillip J. Failla. Melanie A. Calvert, Pasadena, Cal., for Frederick W. Gooding. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before FLETCHER, ALARCON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. ALARCON, Circuit Judge: 1 Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc. and Phillip J. Failla, a broker then employed by Shearson, (collectively referred to as Shearson) appeal (No. 88-5506) from the district court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration of the federal securities claims. Frederick W. Gooding (Gooding) cross appeals (No. 88-5509) from the portion of the order granting Shearson's motion to compel arbitration of state law claims and the stay of further proceedings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.