Johnson v. Pacific Lighting Land Company

Good Law
878 F.2d 297·13 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1469·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9095
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 198988-1635California713 words

Opinion

Opinion

878 F.2d 297 13 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1469 Norman R. JOHNSON; Louise C. Johnson; Freeman L. Vacher; Hilma I. Vacher; Fred W. Kamrath; Vera M. Kamrath; Gerda E. Klipfel; D. Clark Conder; Rhea G. Conder; Russell S. Braman; Mae O. Braman; William Ford Montgomery; Nellie Mae Montgomery; Ella M. Gerlinger; Albert M. Cann; Mary E. Cann; Crew Development Company, Inc., a California corporation, as representatives of citrus growers contracting with Blue Goose Growers, Inc., dba Yuma Citrus Co., during 1973-1978, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PACIFIC LIGHTING LAND COMPANY, a California corporation, formerly Blue Goose Growers, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-1635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1989. Decided June 26, 1989. Richard D. Engler, Yuma, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. Stephen E. Richman, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: 1 This case of first impression involves the question of whether the costs of a letter of credit used to secure a supersedeas bond are properly taxable as costs of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.