Frederick G. Land v. George Deeds, Warden and Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of Nevada

Good Law
878 F.2d 318·1989 WL 71808·1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9427
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 198989-15627California260 words

Opinion

Opinion

Frederick Land appeals from a magistrate’s order denying bail pending a decision on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . This is neither an appeal from a final judgment, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , nor a valid interlocutory appeal under the collateral order exception. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 265 , 104 S.Ct. 1051, 1054-55 , 79 L.Ed.2d 288 (1984); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, see Woodcock v. Donnelly, 470 F.2d 93 (1st Cir.1972), Glynn v. Donnelly, 470 F.2d 95 (1st Cir.1972), and we construe this appeal from a non-appealable order as a petition for a writ of mandamus. See Unified Sewerage Agency v. Jelco, Inc., 646 F.2d 1339 , 1343 (9th Cir.1981) (an invalid appeal may be construed as a mandamus petition).

Bail pending a decision in a habeas case is reserved for extraordinary cases involving special circumstances or a high probability of success. See Aronson v. May, 85 S.Ct. 3 , 5, 13 L.Ed.2d 6 (1964); Galante v. Warden, 573 F.2d 707, 708 (2d Cir.1977). Land has not demonstrated that he is entitled to release…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.